Skip to main content

The Toppling of "Silent Sam"

By now most of you who keep up with news that affects Southern history and heritage know that last night, at around 9:20 pm eastern time , a group of communists pulled down the statue of "Silent Sam" on the University of North Carolina campus.

According to Wikipedia:

"The statue was funded by the University Alumni and the United Daughters of the Confederacy. It was erected in 1913 as a memorial to the Confederate alumni who lost their lives in the American Civil War and all students who joined the Confederate States Army.

More than one thousand members of the university fought in the American Civil War in either the Northern or Southern armies, comprising at least 40% of the student body. The University remained open through the entire war. This was due to President Swain's policy of dependency on men unfit for combat.

A bronze image on the front of the memorial depicts a young student dropping his books as he looks up to answer a call to duty. On the base of the statue, a woman representing the state of North Carolina is depicted calling students to fight for the Southern cause even if it means leaving their studies. The statue was erected to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the beginning of the Civil War (1911)."

Today CNN reported:

"Video footage from CNN affiliate WRAL-TV shows protesters putting up poles and banners around the statue during daylight. By nightfall, video from WRAL shows the statue falling and students cheering. Protesters can also be seen kicking and putting dirt on the statue.

In a statement Tuesday morning, UNC-Chapel Hill Chancellor Carol L. Folt said she appreciates the actions taken by police to ensure the campus community's safety during Monday's demonstration.
"Last night's actions were unlawful and dangerous, and we are very fortunate that no one was injured," Folt said in an open letter posted on the school's official website. "The police are investigating the vandalism and assessing the full extent of the damage."

CNN continued:

"North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper's office tweeted a statement saying Cooper has been in contact with local law enforcement and UNC officials about Monday's rally.

"The Governor understands that many people are frustrated by the pace of change and he shares their frustration, but violent destruction of public property has no place in our communities," the statement read."

I'm sure that the University of North Carolina and Governor Cooper are thankful for law enforcement's {in}action. They are thankful the police did nothing while the protesters erected poles and rope around the statue during the day and continued to do nothing that night when the protesters used said poles and rope to pull the statue down.

Yeah I bet Cooper is really thankful the police did nothing because I believe that he ordered the police to do nothing. 

How do I know? Because he said all Confederate monuments in North Carolina should come down, after protesters tore down a Confederate monument...with a rope last year. Are you starting to see a pattern?

Quoting the August 16, 2017 issue of the Washington-Post:

"Telling the people of North Carolina that Civil War history “belongs in textbooks and museums — not a place of allegiance on our Capitol grounds,” Gov. Roy Cooper wrote that his state needs to remove hundreds of Confederate monuments from places of reverence across the state."

The standing down of police at the University of North Carolina in 2018 along with the police standing down in Durham, North Carolina in 2017 is very much like the police standing down at Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017, both states involved Democrat Governors who want to erase history, because that's what communists do. 

Speaking of communists, Big League Politics comes through with another breaking story about last nights destruction at the UNC campus. According to the site:

"The granddaughter of a former chancellor at the University of North Carolina was caught on camera bragging about her participation in the destruction of the “Silent Sam” statue on Monday night.

“So basically what happened was there was four banners on each side – well actually one banner on each side, and they were all connected by sticks,” said Margarita Sitterson, “and people wrapped rope around the sticks and we pulled back and forth and back and forth until it fell down.”

Big League Politics reported:

"A Chapel Hill resident pointed out that there is a Sitterson building on campus. It turns out that Sitterson Hall is named after Margarita’s grandfather, J. Carlyle Sitterson, who served as chancellor of the university from 1966 to 1972.

When asked if her name was on one of the buildings, Sitterson readily admitted that her grandfather is a UNC alumnus, and that he spent his entire life working at the school.“My grandfather – he went here for college, then he became a professor, then he became a dean [inaudible], then he became chancellor.”

Sitterson said she was ashamed and that she carried guilt because she is white, and white people owned slaves."

Was it really slavery that motivated Ms. Sitterson to participate in this destruction of property? Is slavery the reason she is ashamed of her grandfather or could there be a different reason?

Margarita Sitterson's grandfather was J. Carlyle Sitterson. Once again turning to Wikipedia for a quick reference we learn that:

"Joseph Carlyle "Lyle" Sitterson (January 17, 1911 – May 19, 1995) was an American educator who served as chancellor of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill from February 16, 1966, to January 31, 1972.

A native of Kinston, North Carolina, Sitterson first came to UNC in 1927 as an undergraduate student. He remained at the University, joining the faculty of the history department in 1935 and later earning his Ph.D., also in history.[1] In 1955, Sitterson became the dean of the School of Arts and Sciences, becoming vice chancellor in 1965 under Chancellor Paul F. Sharp.

On February 16, 1966, Sitterson was installed as chancellor of the University, succeeding outgoing Chancellor Paul Sharp.[3]Sitterson took office in the midst of the controversy surrounding the North Carolina Speaker Ban Law, a state law passed on June 26, 1963 by the North Carolina General Assembly which forbade individuals who were known to be members of the Communist Party or had invoked the Fifth Amendment in connection with congressional investigations of communist activities from speaking on any of the campuses of the University of North Carolina."

I submit that Ms. Margarita Sitterson's participation in this event has less to do with slavery and more to do with obtaining "street cred" from her communist friends.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Revealed: SPLC Co-Founder Accused of Trying to Molest Step-Daughter

Southern Poverty Law Center Founder Morris Dees Tried to Molest Step-Daughter Chances are that if you're reading this you have heard of The Southern Poverty Law Center. The non for profit legal organization that has provided information to law enforcement and is a "go to" source of information by almost every reporter that encounters a "controversial" story. Widely known for its defense of Civil Rights the SPLC has filled its coffers defending the oppressed and exposing hate-groups, at least that is how the organization wants to be perceived. The reality is that the SPLC has made their millions by twisting the facts. They would have the public believe there is a Klansman hiding behind every tree and a Nazi at every podium.  I once found myself in their crosshairs by proposing to hoist a Missouri Battle Flag at the grave of Missouri Confederate Colonel William Jeffers in Jackson, Missouri. The ironic thing about their opposition to this "hate-c...

Emancipation Expectations

Some historians believe that the Emancipation Proclamation never freed a single slave and that it was a political ploy to garner support for the war by rebranding it as a moral fight. Information found in the National Archives seems to support their argument. According to the article entitled " Emancipation Proclamation, 1863 ": "Although the Emancipation Proclamation did not immediately free a single slave, it captured the hearts and imagination of millions of African Americans, and fundamentally transformed the character of the war from a war for the Union into a war for freedom." The transformation was a success politically but in reality the "emancipated" slaves were labeled as "contraband".  Their fate was not freedom but rather a new type of slavery through exploitation. Information found in a paper entitled " Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race and the 1863 Helena Campaign " states: "By early June ...

The Rape of Delaware County

$10 paperback / $.99 Kindle When I was first contacted by Edwin Turlington in the summer of 2018 I was told as story that literally seemed stranger than fiction. A veteran of the U.S. Army was telling me that he was facing a 10-year prison sentence for shooting a felon on his property who had threatened him. Mr. Turlington asked me if I could write an article to help get his story out to the public, being a sucker for a good story I agreed to do it. The story revealed that the corruption in Edwin Turlington’s case, extended throughout the county and included “snitches” given free passes to break the law, a county jail system so corrupt that local property taxes had to be raised to settle the lawsuits of former female inmates, and a local lawyer who made international headlines for his involvement in a murder for hire plot. As the article began to gain attention, Mr. Turlington urged me to write a book about the events, thinking it could be a vital tool to p...