Skip to main content

The Story Within the Story: Hypocrisy of Northern Slavery Revealed




Newspaper clipping from a 1786 issue of the Vermont Gazette
Today the Drudge Report linked to a story published in the Burlington Free Press. The headline reads "
Christine Hallquist is the first transgender nominee. Here are 6 times Vermont was a social frontrunner"

The obvious focal point the reader is drawn to is the news that Christine Hallquist is the first transgender political nominee in the history of the nation but it's something buried within the story that got my attention. It reads:

"1777: Vermont leads colonies in abolishing adult slavery" which provides the following information:

"Before it was a state in the union, Vermont was the first of the colonial territories to abolish adult slavery. While this didn't always translate into actual practice, it was written into the state's constitution adopted the same year. Some historians have said that the slavery section of Vermont's constitution had loopholes since it didn't apply to children. Vermont officially became a state in 1791"

Here lies the real story about Vermont and slavery. Within the provided text it is revealed the magnanimous act of Vermont in abolishing slavery there was a loophole in which certain cases owners were allowed to keep their slaves.

When one clicks on the link provided within the text it is learned that:

"Vermont was the first of the former British colonies to ban slavery — it was part of the state's constitution adopted in 1777 — but in reality some wealthy landowners continued to own slaves into the 1800s."

Within this text

"The legal reality of abolishing slavery did not always reflect social reality," Harvey Amani Whitfield, associate professor of history at the University of Vermont here, writes in a newly published monograph. "The end of Vermont slavery was contested, contingent, complicated and messy.

Vermont made steps toward abolition, but slaveholding, kidnapping of free blacks, and child slavery continued until the early 19th century," he wrote. "Those who continued to own slaves were among the most respectable inhabitants of the state."




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Thank You all comments must be reviewed before being published. Your's will be posted shortly.

Popular posts from this blog

Revealed: SPLC Co-Founder Accused of Trying to Molest Step-Daughter

Southern Poverty Law Center Founder Morris Dees Tried to Molest Step-Daughter Chances are that if you're reading this you have heard of The Southern Poverty Law Center. The non for profit legal organization that has provided information to law enforcement and is a "go to" source of information by almost every reporter that encounters a "controversial" story. Widely known for its defense of Civil Rights the SPLC has filled its coffers defending the oppressed and exposing hate-groups, at least that is how the organization wants to be perceived. The reality is that the SPLC has made their millions by twisting the facts. They would have the public believe there is a Klansman hiding behind every tree and a Nazi at every podium.  I once found myself in their crosshairs by proposing to hoist a Missouri Battle Flag at the grave of Missouri Confederate Colonel William Jeffers in Jackson, Missouri. The ironic thing about their opposition to this "hate-c...
Post a Comment
Read more

An Open Letter to Cape Girardeau Missouri Mayor Bob Fox Regarding the City's Confederate Monument

An Open Letter to Cape Girardeau Mayor Bob Fox, Cape Girardeau, Missouri Dear Mayor Fox, On June 12, 2020 KFVS-12 news interviewed a “community activist” who created a petition calling for the removal of a memorial honoring Southeast Missouri’s Confederate soldiers. In the interview Sophia Voss made a baseless claim that the statue was originally erected in 1931 near the old Mississippi River bridge on Morgan Oak street as a warning to African-American citizens traveling through the area. There is no basis for that claim whatsoever. KFVS also interviewed “community historian” Denise Lincoln who stated, “I think that if I were African-American, bringing my family through this area, and the first thing I saw was CSA, a monument to the Confederacy, this might be a town you just keep driving through.” I can’t help but feel that Mrs. Lincoln lacks professionalism and objectivity. If I were an African-American traveling through Cape Girardeau the first thing I would notice is the depleted co...
Post a Comment
Read more

Emancipation Expectations

Some historians believe that the Emancipation Proclamation never freed a single slave and that it was a political ploy to garner support for the war by rebranding it as a moral fight. Information found in the National Archives seems to support their argument. According to the article entitled " Emancipation Proclamation, 1863 ": "Although the Emancipation Proclamation did not immediately free a single slave, it captured the hearts and imagination of millions of African Americans, and fundamentally transformed the character of the war from a war for the Union into a war for freedom." The transformation was a success politically but in reality the "emancipated" slaves were labeled as "contraband".  Their fate was not freedom but rather a new type of slavery through exploitation. Information found in a paper entitled " Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race and the 1863 Helena Campaign " states: "By early June ...
Post a Comment
Read more