Skip to main content

THE PONDER PAPERS: THE WILSON MASSACRE AND REEVES' REVENGE

Today I made another visit to the Missouri Historical Society to dig through The Ponder Papers. Most people call this research but I prefer to call it "treasure hunting".  Some of the items I chose to copy were correspondence from people such as John L. Margreiter, dated July 3, 1993.

Mr. Margreiter is , admittedly and admirer of Major James Wilson, 3'rd Missouri State Militia Cavalry (Union). That being said in his letter to Jerry Ponder states:

"I found your observations concerning Major Wilson most interesting, even though I admired him (and the 3'rd Cavalry, MSM) for more than twenty-five years. Until I received your letter I had never read or heard anything detrimental about him, but then history always favors the winning side. In 1991 (having lost most of my interest in the Civil War in the late 70's) I again took up the subject and decided to write a paper on Major Wilson; that was the reason for the ad in Military Images. Having procrastinated for almost a year, some six weeks ago I finally got into active research again. I'm looking for any information , good or bad, on Major Wilson and the events that led to his death; my only criterion is that it must be historically documented not word-of-mouth."

Mr. Margreiter must have found the information Ponder provided credible, in a paper found in the correspondence between Mr. Gene Dressell and Mr. Ponder that investigated the reasons for Colonel Timothy Reeves' execution of Major James Wilson and men of his command.

"Reves and Wilson were old enemies whose men had often traded roles as the hunter and the hunted. Wilson and his men had burned Doniphan, Missouri, Reves' hometown. There is also evidence that on Christmas, 1863 Wilson and the 3'rd Missouri Cavalry surprised the guerrillas in their camp. Unknown to Wilson the guerrillas family had joined them for the holiday celebration. The attack may have resulted in as many as many as 30 civilian casualties, including as many as three of the guerrillas's wives."

The footnote on this piece of information states that it was gleaned from correspondence between author Mark Crawford and Mr. Margreiter dated July 21, 1992. 

Someone has written "Incorrect" in the left margin of the paper and circled "Unknown to Wilson" indicating that Major James Wilson did know civilians were present at the gathering on Christmas Day, 1863 in Ripley County, Missouri.

Also found in the correspondence between Jerry Ponder and Gene Dressell is a paper entitled "Major James Wilson File" dated St. Louis November 9, 1864. The correspondence is to General Rosecrans from Geo. M. Porter.

Porter writes:

"Another point General, and I am done- Why did Major Wilson regard his life in such imminent peril while Capt. Dinger- also a prisoner- was in no danger ?  The inference is that he was conscience of having been guilty of some act contrary to the rules of war whereby his life was in danger - I make no reference to the acts of violence -said to have been committed by him but confine myself to the testimony furnished by the city papers on Oct. 31'st . And the conclusions deductible from that testimony."
















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fake News and False Information On Mississippi Scalawag Flag Proposal

WREG News Channel 3 (Memphis , Tennessee) is reporting : Photo credit: WREG News 3 "Laurin Stennis’ flag design has gained so much popularity that even those who order the flag want her autograph. She matched the colors exactly to the United States flag. “I think those are wonderful colors and the symbolism is meaningful, but also this is a strong standalone but when you pair it with the United States flag they make a handsome couple,” said Stennis. Nineteen stars circle around a large star, which represents Mississippi as the 20th state to join the Union in 1817. The large star is called Bonnie Blue. Stennis had some help producing the flags with Complete Flag Source. To date, well over 2,000 Stennis flags have been sold." According to the report Stennis' asks: "Is our logo doing it’s job? I would argue absolutely not because every time it comes up we fight about and we get tense.” Okay, where to start? WREG reports that the flag is

The War That Wasn't: The Real Agenda Against All Things Confederate

The illustration on the left is an artist's concept of a Union soldier. I have to admit, I'm quite perplexed by it. Why? I shall tell you why. First he has a rifle. Second he has a uniform, a canteen a bedroll and a knapsack. In other words, this would-be soldier has all of the supplies and equipment that would ready him for a military campaign / battle. Why does this perplex me?  It perplexes me because recent events have led me to the conclusion that the "War Between the States" never happened. Given the events of recent years it's natural to conclude it didn't happen. Fox news compiled a running list of Confederate monuments that have been removed thus far and while the majority of those were at the hands of Democrats, there are several Republicans behind the removal of them.   Below is the list compiled by Fox News correspondent Christopher Carbone. christopher.carbone@foxnews.com Annapolis, Md. Under cover of da

How We Got Here , What Can We Do?

 For as long as I can remember both the Republican and Democratic parties have had their fair share of Lincoln defenders. The Republican Party was founded with the election of Abraham Lincoln thus Lincoln has been the party's trademark so to speak. The problem with this is that the Republican Party, presents itself as the party of smaller government, states rights and defenders of the Constitution and freedom. It is a problem because Lincoln was a proponent of big government, and committed acts that violated the Constitution. Ah, but defenders of Lincoln proclaim that President Lincoln had  to violate the Constitution to "save the Union." This defense of Lincoln by the Republican party has been effective from the end of the War Between the States until November , 2020 At the time of America's "Civil War" one could describe the Republicans as the Liberals and the Democrats as the Conservatives. This began to change with the election of President Franklin D. R